EvoWiki is now a project of the
We are moving all content to RationalWiki.
See the for details! .
Darwin's work refers to preservation of favoured races
- Morris, Henry M., 2004. Evolution and Modern Racism 
- Weston, Paula, 1997-1998. The fallacy of racism. Creation Ex Nihilo 20(1): 52-53, 
- Hughes, Sharon, 2005. The Effects Of Evolution's Racist Roots On Students, American Daily 
- "Race" to a 19th century naturalist simply meant distinct populations within a specific species, not necessarily human races. Indeed, human races, nor even human evolution are not discussed at all in Darwin's first book on evolution. And as such, given as how the "races" mentioned in Darwin's book included various pigeon and pig breeds, as well as certain mollusks, any claim that suggests that Darwin was "racist" is totally absurd.
- Whoever makes or uses this claim has never so much as read any of Darwin's works, especially since "On the Origin of Species" never discusses human evolution in the first place.
- "Race," ala "racial variant," is still used by modern-day biologists to refer to different populations within species, with no racist connotations, in fact.
- "The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" is the subtitle of Darwin's Origin of Species. It can be taken to mean the same thing as the later phrase "survival of the fittest" which was not coined by Darwin. The phrase illustrates a consequence of, not a basis for, evolution.
- add more responses
Fallacies contained in this claim
- Abusive Ad Hominem (Darwin is racist)
- Straw Man (Darwin is accused of an argument he doesn't make)
- Equivocation ("race" has another meaning here)
- Mark Isaak's page for this claim 
- CreationWiki's comments 
- The Mis-portrayal of Darwin as a Racist 
- Mayr, Ernst, 2000 (Jul.). Darwin's influence on modern thought. Scientific American 283(1): 78-83.